← All questionsGS4 · 2016 · Ethics, Integrity & Aptitude ·Ethics Theory
QUESTION 3(b)
GS4
10 marks

Discuss the Public Services Code as recommended by the Second Administrative Reforms Commission.

WRITE IN
7 min
150 words

What the examiner wants

Discuss the exact proposition in the PYQ — “Discuss the Public Services Code as recommended by the Second Administrative Reforms Commission.” — using concept/chronology or mechanism, evidence on both sides where relevant, and a conclusion that answers the directive rather than merely describing Ethics Theory.

DiscussExplain the different sides of the issue, use evidence, and finish with a balanced view.

Demand-wise check

  1. 1For the prompt cue ‘Discuss the Public Services Code as recommended by the Second Administrative Reforms Commission.’, directly answer: Discuss the Public Services Code as recommended by the Second Administrative Reforms Commission≈35 words
  2. 2For the prompt cue ‘Discuss the Public Services Code as recommended by the Second Administrative Reforms Commission.’, build the causal/institutional mechanism behind Ethics Theory, not just a list of features≈35 words
  3. 3For the prompt cue ‘Discuss the Public Services Code as recommended by the Second Administrative Reforms Commission.’, add one verified official-source anchor and a limitation/counterpoint specific to Ethics Theory≈35 words

Open in about 20 words and close in about 20.

Answer plan

Define/contextualise Ethics TheoryExplain mechanism/chronologyQuestion-specific evidence/examplesImplicationsConcise conclusion

Where marks usually go

  • For the prompt cue ‘Discuss the Public Services Code as recommended by the Second Administrative Reforms Commission.’, avoid a generic note on Ethics Theory; answer the actual wording/directive and the Ethics Theory proposition
  • For the prompt cue ‘Discuss the Public Services Code as recommended by the Second Administrative Reforms Commission.’, do not add examples around Ethics Theory unless they prove, qualify or rebut the proposition asked

Value addition

  • 3-box flow: concept/context → core argument/evidence → implication/way forward
    → Draw it in the body, next to the point it supports.

Official source anchors

These are authoritative sources selected for this exact PYQ. Where a card is an official-domain anchor rather than a fact-level citation, verify the precise provision, definition or data point on the linked source before using it.