← All questionsGS2 · 2013 · Polity & Constitution ·Fundamental Rights
QUESTION N01
GS2
10 marks

Discuss Section 66A of IT Act, with reference to its alleged violation of Article 19 of the Constitution.

WRITE IN
7 min
200 words

What the examiner wants

Discuss the exact proposition in the PYQ — “Discuss Section 66A of IT Act, with reference to its alleged violation of Article 19 of the Constitution.” — using concept/chronology or mechanism, evidence on both sides where relevant, and a conclusion that answers the directive rather than merely describing Fundamental Rights.

DiscussExplain the different sides of the issue, use evidence, and finish with a balanced view.

Demand-wise check

  1. 1For the prompt cue ‘Discuss Section 66A of IT Act, with reference to its alleged violation of Article 19 of the Constitution.’, directly answer: Discuss Section 66A of IT Act, with reference to its alleged violation of Article 19 of the Constitution≈45 words
  2. 2For the prompt cue ‘Discuss Section 66A of IT Act, with reference to its alleged violation of Article 19 of the Constitution.’, build the causal/institutional mechanism behind Fundamental Rights, not just a list of features≈45 words
  3. 3For the prompt cue ‘Discuss Section 66A of IT Act, with reference to its alleged violation of Article 19 of the Constitution.’, add one verified official-source anchor and a limitation/counterpoint specific to Fundamental Rights≈45 words

Open in about 30 words and close in about 30.

Answer plan

Define/contextualise Fundamental RightsExplain mechanism/chronologyQuestion-specific evidence/examplesImplicationsConcise conclusion

Where marks usually go

  • For the prompt cue ‘Discuss Section 66A of IT Act, with reference to its alleged violation of Article 19 of the Constitution.’, avoid a generic note on Fundamental Rights; answer the actual wording/directive and the Fundamental Rights proposition
  • For the prompt cue ‘Discuss Section 66A of IT Act, with reference to its alleged violation of Article 19 of the Constitution.’, do not add examples around Fundamental Rights unless they prove, qualify or rebut the proposition asked

Value addition

  • Provision/institution → issue → implication table
    → Draw it in the body, next to the point it supports.

Official source anchors

These are authoritative sources selected for this exact PYQ. Where a card is an official-domain anchor rather than a fact-level citation, verify the precise provision, definition or data point on the linked source before using it.