As a senior ministry officer, you have advance knowledge of a mega road project. A minister asks you to realign the road closer to his farmhouse and offers to facilitate purchase of nearby land in your wife’s name. The change would increase land acquisition, public cost, displacement and tree cutting, while potentially benefiting the minister and you. What will you do? Critically examine the conflicts of interest and your responsibilities as a public servant.
What the examiner wants
Critically examine: answer the exact PYQ as framed — “As a senior ministry officer, you have advance knowledge of a mega road project. A minister asks you to realign the road closer to his farmhouse and offers to facilitate purchase of nearby land in your wife’s name. The change would increase land acquisition,…” Treat each scoring limb separately instead of writing a general note on Minister Road Realignment Coercion.
Demand-wise check
- 1Map the stakeholders, facts, competing obligations and the ethical/public-interest conflict embedded in the case≈65 words
- 2Answer each explicit sub-question in the case and compare feasible options using legality, consequences, rights, fairness and integrity≈65 words
- 3Choose and justify an implementable course of action, including safeguards, accountability and follow-through≈65 words
Open in about 30 words and close in about 30.
Answer plan
Where marks usually go
- Writing generally about Minister Road Realignment Coercion without directly resolving: “As a senior ministry officer, you have advance knowledge of a mega road project.”
- Under-developing the second scoring limb: “A minister asks you to realign the road closer to his farmhouse and offers to facilitate purchase of nearby land in your wife’s name.”
Value addition
- Stakeholder map + options-versus-values decision matrix
→ Draw it in the body, next to the point it supports.
Official source anchors
These are authoritative sources selected for this exact PYQ. Where a card is an official-domain anchor rather than a fact-level citation, verify the precise provision, definition or data point on the linked source before using it.
Next: plan for one minute, write it in 14 minutes, then get it checked.