Judicial Legislation is antithetical to the doctrine of separation of powers as envisaged in the Indian Constitution. In this context justify the filing of large number of public interest petitions praying for issuing guidelines to executive authorities.
What the examiner wants
Justify: answer the exact PYQ as framed — “Judicial Legislation is antithetical to the doctrine of separation of powers as envisaged in the Indian Constitution. In this context justify the filing of large number of public interest petitions praying for issuing guidelines to executive authorities.” Treat each scoring limb separately instead of writing a general note on Separation of powers(Judicial Legislation & PILs).
Demand-wise check
- 1Judicial Legislation is antithetical to the doctrine of separation of powers as envisaged in the Indian Constitution≈95 words
- 2In this context justify the filing of large number of public interest petitions praying for issuing guidelines to executive authorities≈95 words
Open in about 30 words and close in about 30.
Answer plan
Where marks usually go
- Writing generally about Separation of powers(Judicial Legislation & PILs) without directly resolving: “Judicial Legislation is antithetical to the doctrine of separation of powers as envisaged in the Indian Constitution.”
- Under-developing the second scoring limb: “In this context justify the filing of large number of public interest petitions praying for issuing guidelines to executive authorities.”
Value addition
- 3–4 node flowchart or dimension wheel keyed to the question’s main components
→ Draw it in the body, next to the point it supports.
Official source anchors
These are authoritative sources selected for this exact PYQ. Where a card is an official-domain anchor rather than a fact-level citation, verify the precise provision, definition or data point on the linked source before using it.
Next: plan for one minute, write it in 11 minutes, then get it checked.